Pages

3 Ways You May Be Throwing Money Away Without Realizing It

You aren't a dimwit. You're just stressed.
According to a recent study published in Science magazine, if you're poor and mismanage your money, you may be very capable of making good financial decisions. But you're trapped in a vicious circle: The inevitable problems that come with being poor are likely affecting your judgment, which means you're making bad decisions, which end up making you even more poor.
With that in mind, if you're financially struggling - or know someone who is - here are three ways people end up throwing money away when making common financial decisions: buying a house, buying a car and investing in a retirement plan. They're all generally good ideas, of course, but just because you're doing something smart doesn't mean you're doing it right.
Stretching to take out a mortgage. Few personal finance experts will say it's stupid to buy a house - but they will tell you that you can buy one too early in life, before you're financially ready. Many people also buy too big of a house.
"I can't tell you how many people I've seen get swept up in the romantic notion that they need to own a home or that they need to own a more expensive home, only to later regret it when they end up with a beautiful place but no money," says Scott Halliwell, a certified financial planner with USAA, a national financial services company based in San Antonio that mostly serves military members and their families.
[Read: 5 Financial Decisions That Sound Smart But Are Really Dumb.]
Halliwell says too many people try to buy a house before they've learned to budget. These red flags, he says, should alert you that you aren't financially ready: if you don't yet have an emergency fund, you can't save up for a sizable down payment (20 percent is standard) or you're trying to find another way to buy a house, such as taking on a high interest rate in place of having that down payment.
He has a point, especially considering that a house comes not only with a monthly mortgage that you'll likely be paying for the next 30 years - but also homeowners insurance, yard maintenance, appliances and furniture to buy and the inevitable home repairs. Most lenders say your house payment shouldn't be more than 30 percent of your income, so if you're searching for a way to buy a house that is going to be, say, 40 or 50 percent of your income, you might want to do some serious reconsidering.
Halliwell adds: "We always talk about how much money someone can save if they just stop drinking fancy coffee. The truth is, coffee doesn't do anywhere near the damage this move can."
Buying a too-expensive car. If you're not paying attention, the car you're buying may not seem all that expensive. The auto finance manager may suggest that instead of three years, you pay for six, and that $531 monthly payment for an $18,000 car decreases to $282, obscuring the fact that you'll end up paying far more in the long run, especially if you aren't getting a good interest rate.
For instance, if your car's interest rate is around 4 percent, which is average these days, paying the loan over six years instead of three means you'll pay $1,145 more just in interest. That might be worth it for the lower payments. But let's say you have bad credit and you're paying a high interest rate. Buying an $18,000 car at 18 percent (a typical interest rate if your credit score is, say, 550 and you're buying a used car) and paying it over three years means you'll shell out approximately $5,000 just in interest. Spreading the loan over six years means your interest alone will climb to $11,000. Your $18,000 car is actually a $29,000 car.
[Read: 6 Money-Saving Strategies That May Cost You In the Long Run.]
Of course, it can be easy to rush into buying a car, especially if your current vehicle is on life support. But not only should you make use of the many monthly loan payment calculators for car-buying on the Web, remember to research how a new or new-to-you car will affect your insurance and your auto's gas mileage.
"We're certainly a nation in love with automobiles, and I'm right there with the crowd," Halliwell says. "Even so, I'm forever amazed at the number of $40,000 to $50,000 cars and trucks I see on the road every day. The payments on those loans are huge by average financial standards, and the cars are often worth thousands less than the purchase price within days of buying them."
Many experts suggest ensuring that the car you buy is no more than 1/10th of your gross annual income. So if you make $70,000 a year, you shouldn't buy more than a $7,000 car. Even if that doesn't seem realistic, it's a good blueprint to try to follow. After all, six years is a long time to lock yourself into paying for a car, which depreciates the moment it is driven off the lot.
"I regularly get questions from people about what they can do to fix their auto loan situation when only three years into their six-year loan term, their circumstances change and they can no longer afford the payment," Halliwell says. "Unfortunately, in many cases, they owe thousands more on the loan than the vehicle is worth, so they're often stuck."
Withdrawing money from your retirement plan for anything other than retirement. Yes, times are still tough for some people, but short of dredging up money to save your house from going into foreclosure or raising ransom money for a kidnapper, most financial gurus will tell you to stay away from your 401(k) or individual retirement account.
[See: 12 Money Mistakes Almost Everyone Makes.]
"Too many people take money out of a qualified plan or IRA to pay for everyday expenses. The Department of Labor has a word for this: 'leakage,'" says Kenn Tacchino, professor of taxation and financial planning at Widener University in Chester, Penn.
How devastating can it be? Tacchino says that when he is in the classroom, he offers his students this example:
"A 25-year-old is getting married and he wants to buy a $5,000 engagement ring. He is in the 28 percent marginal bracket and he will pay a 10 percent penalty to take the money from his IRA. He will need to take out $8,064 to buy the ring and pay the taxes. He throws caution to the wind and takes out the $8,064. Five thousand goes to buy the ring, and $3,064 goes to taxes. Had he kept the money and earned an 8 percent rate of return, he would have had over $195,000 at 65 for retirement. That's quite a ring!"

UFC 165: Jon Jones survives five-round battle, beats Alexander Gustafsson via unanimous decision

TORONTO – Jon Jones had to work like never before to keep his light heavyweight title, but a strong finish led him to a unanimous decision in the main event of UFC 165 at the Air Canada Centre.

Jones won by scores of 48-47 twice and 49-46 in the toughest fight of his title reign. Yahoo Sports scored it 48-47 for Jones, giving Jones rounds 2, 4 and 5 and Gustafsson rounds 1 and 3.

Jones' title defense was his sixth, setting a division record for most successful title defenses at light heavyweight.

"Alexander was the best I've fought, by far," Jones said.

Gustafsson took the fight to Jones, using his boxing and, stunningly, his wrestling to get out to an early lead. He cut Jones over the right eye and by the fourth round, Jones was a mess, with blood streaming down his face and chest.

[Related: Slideshow: Best photos of UFC 165]

Like a champion, though, Jones rallied when it mattered most. In the fourth with the fight in the balance, Jones landed a move he had been trying a lot throughout the fight, connecting with a massive spinning elbow.

For the first time, Gustafsson seemed impacted by the blow and staggered back against the cage. Jones landed another and then flurried on Gustafsson, but he didn't have time to finish.

The fifth round went Jones' way, as he landed several kicks and finally got a takedown. Earlier in the fight, Gustafsson became the first man to take Jones down in the UFC.

Jones, who has dominated his fights in the past by taking opponents down and blasting them with razor-sharp elbows on the ground, had that taken away from him for the most part on Saturday. Gustafsson also neutralized Jones' clinch game.

But Jones' arsenal of strikes was so big, and he found a way to get the elbows and kicks in late in the fight that scored points and helped him retain his title.
Summer's end may have you feeling a bit down, but if you're anything like me, it's a comfort to know that the treasures of fall — Halloween, the leaves turning color, and apples (and apple picking!) — are just around the corner. We all know that apples help keep the doctor away, but I was fascinated to learn just how healthy my favorite fall fruits really are. Here, incredibly healthy reasons to go bananas for apples:

1. Apples Help You Lose Weight.

Apples are packed with fiber (with over 4 grams per medium apple) and water, so your stomach will stay satisfied longer and want less food. Studies out of Brazil have shown that people who eat at least three apples or pears a day lose weight. In one study, groups were given either oat cookies, apples or pears three times a day. The group given oat cookies did not lose weight while those that ate either the apples or the pears lost an average of nearly three pounds over the course of twelve weeks. What's more, the fruit-munching group had lower blood glucose levels.

2. Apples stabilize blood sugar.

Around one gram of apples' fiber is the soluble kind, which slows the digestion of food and the entry of glucose into the bloodstream, which prevents spikes of sugar and insulin that can lead to type 2 diabetes. One group of researchers discovered that women who ate at least one apple a day were 28 percent less likely to develop diabetes than those who ate none.

3. Apples fight high cholesterol.

Apples are low in calories (only 95 per medium fruit) and high in the soluble fiber pectin, which helps lower artery-damaging LDL blood cholesterol levels. A study publisehd in the Journal of Functional Foods found that an apple a day lowered study participants' LDL by 40% compared to people taking a placebo. Since high cholesterol can harden arteries (which can lead to a heart attack or stroke), lowering cholesterol levels is a key step to maintain a healthy heart.

4. Apples prevent high blood pressure.

Adults who eat apples are 37 percent less likely to have hypertension, according to a recent food database analysis. Scientists believe antioxidants found in the skin may contribute to keeping blood pressure in check, so don't ditch that peel!

Read about more incredible health benefits of apples!

MORE FROM READER’S DIGEST

"I Lost 60 Pounds and Got My Life Back!"
13 Digest Diet-Approved Cozy Fall Recipes
7 Tricks to Make a Healthy Smoothie
8 Ways to Train Your Brain to Hate Junk Food
Lean Protein: 11 Healthy Ways to Load Up

Damning figures in HRCP report on violence against women

LAHORE: Alarming figures of increasing cases of violence against women were presented in a Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) report issued recently.

Violation against women is widespread in Pakistan and exists in various forms be it domestic violence and abuse, sexual abuse and harassment, acid attacks, honour killings, restricted freedom of movement to downright barring of women from casting their votes in the elections.

The Commission in its statement said: “HRCP has watched with grave concern the rising incidence of violence against women in Pakistan in recent days. Unfortunately, such incidents have always been commonplace in the country but now such reports are coming not from far-off places but from the main cities."

Several cases of rape have been reported from Punjab in the past few days, including that of a five-year old child.

To give an idea of the scale of the problem, in the city of Lahore alone, police have registered 113 cases of rape from January 1 to August 31 this year.

In the same period, police in the provincial capital of Punjab registered 32 gang-rape cases.

Most of the victims were teenage girls.

The problem in hardly confined to Punjab.

The plight of Kainat Soomro, a young rape victim in Sindh, and the excesses she has had to endure in her efforts to bring her tormentors to justice are there for all to see.

Her ordeal represents how rape victims who have the courage to pursue their rapists are left to fend for themselves.

Moreover, according to media monitoring by HRCP, until the end of July this year, at least 44 women became targets of acid attacks in the country, seven of whom had died due to their injuries.

As many as 44 women had been set on fire; 11 had died in such attacks.

Furthermore, as many as 451 women had been killed in Pakistan in the name of honour in 2013 by the end of July, compared to 918 killed in 2012.

Earlier this week, three women were shot dead by family members in the name of ‘honour’ in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.

Furthermore, HRCP is acutely concerned that risks have grown for all those who try and help the victims is any manner or try to expose the excesses.

Human rights defenders who try to highlight excesses against women have become particularly vulnerable, the statement issued by the HRCP said.

In fact, an HRCP staff member had to be relocated just a fortnight earlier because his reporting of a woman’s beating by her relatives upset the family to the extent that they threatened to kill him and started following him.

Such targeting of a section of population solely on account of gender is utterly unacceptable and it is a matter of shame that the society at large has not felt compelled to raise a strong enough voice to putting an end to this travesty, the commission said.

HRCP has called upon the state authorities to include ending violence against women and impunity for the violators to its list of priorities in order to dispense justice to half the population of the country.

The commission's statement said it hoped that these steps would include awareness campaigns and would not merely be confined to making changes in laws that then remain unenforced.

Obama pushes for Syria strike in televised address

WASHINGTON: US President Barack Obama pushed his case for military strikes against the Syrian regime in a televised address to the nation despite a promise from Damascus to hand over its chemical arms for destruction.

Obama said that he had deeply held preference for peaceful solutions and had seen encouraging signs in the last few days.

The US president added that he had asked Congress to postpone votes on Syria action to pursue diplomatic solution, noting that Secretary of State John Kerry would head to Geneva to meet his Russian counterpart on Thursday.

He futher said that the US will work with France, Britain, China and Russia on a United Nations’ Resolution requiring Assad to give up chemical weapons.

However, Obama said that it was too early to tell if the Russian plan on Syria would succeed adding that the initiative had the potential to remove weapons without force.

President Barack Obama said that he had ordered the US military to maintain its position to keep pressure on Syrian President Bashar al Assad and to be ready to respond if diplomacy failed.

He said the use of chemical weapons on Aug 21 shifted his thinking and that the United States must respond with a military strike to deter future use of such weapons.

In his televised address Obama said that the Assad government did not have the ability to seriously threaten US military and added that Israel could defend itself with overwhelming force and US support.

Obama said that after Iraq, Afghanistan he knows that idea of military action not popular and that no ground troops, no open-ended action, no prolonged air campaign would take place in Syria.

He said that the US was not the world's policeman, but when with "modest effort and risk" it can stop children from being gassed to death, US should act, adding that some times resolutions or statements of condemnation were simply not enough.

The US president added that even a limited US strike would be no 'pinprick' and that it would send a message to Syria's Assad and that a targeted strike would make him think twice before using chemical weapons.

Obama said no one disputes that chemical weapons were used and said thousands of Syrians have died from them.

The US president said that 'we know' Assad regime is responsible for chemical weapons attack and that Syria's use of chemical weapons violates international law, and is a ''danger to our security''.

“If we fail to act, the Assad regime will see no reason to stop using chemical weapons,” said Obama.

He added that 'other tyrants' will think nothing of using poison gas if US does not act on Syria.

Obama said that Iran would be emboldened and al Qaeda would draw strength if world sees innocent civilians being gassed in Syria without global response.

US President Barack Obama denounced what he called the “sickening” chemical weapons attack by Syrian forces in the Damascus suburbs, and said it posed a “danger” to US security as US ideals, principals, national security were at stake in Syria.

“When dictators commit atrocities, they depend on the world to look the other way until those horrifying pictures fade from memory,” Obama, making his case for military action, said in a much-anticipated televised address to the nation.

“The question now is what the United States of America and the international community is prepared to do about it,” he added.